I’m always suspicious of the “pedophile” comments. Not that I think it’s fake on lamebook, but that it’s probably the work of someone who hacked into that person’s account and trying to do as much damage as possible. Real pedophiles have generally learned by now not to advertise on facebook.
Or I suppose he could be just a jackass who think that kind of thing is funny.
My only comment on the first picture is that poor deer. And also, what a hick.
The second one… Why… Why on earth would he say that? Creeeeper…
Also, I’d like to be the first to point out that the dog’s face is blurred.
I reeeeeaaaally reeeeeeeeeaaaally hope that some clever individual photoshopped a comment from another picture (perhaps where some beautiful woman is blowing a dandelion) under that picture and submitted it (or something like that). Please?
I am no stranger to what Douglas is doing. In college two fisher/hunter housemates of mine were on their way back from a fishing trip and spotted a deer that had just been hit by a car and was virtually undamaged yet dead. They loaded it into the back of their truck and brought it back to the house. It was still warm and in remarkably good shape so I was in agreement that it shouldn’t go to waste. In my curiousity I sat in the backyard to watch them butcher it but before this took place one of them spread the legs of the dear and mimicked himself performing cunnilingus on the poor animal while the other took photos. I found it disturbing and baffling more then funny.
Adam’s post is the same, not funny just disturbing, and baffling for the fact that he is open about his pedophilia.
Probably, that is the case ’cause the kid has one adult hand holding the dandelion lol
That could be that dandelion picture used on kodak where you learn to merge pictures on photoshop.
I’m with you Salamanizer. I see a bunch of hands in that second Photo.
regarding the first, I find it disturbing that his pants AND underwear are around his ankles. after all, the same joke (sick as it might be) could have been accomplished with the pants securely fastened.
What do you think he and Carlo were doing out in those woods…?
@ Sensible Madness: My thoughts exactly. There is a joke and then there is this kind of commitment. Its like “Im about to do something creepy and weird. But I want people to get the voms over it too” So down go the pants and skiddies. And I see all the hands too. Someones out to make the dude look like a ass.
Yeah, that wasn’t supposed to be a baby. It’s really some lady with a dandelion in her hand. We had that as a tutorial in Print + Communications for photoshopping stuff. That idiot that submitted it probably used the same tutorial that a bunch of high schoolers used too. So… GRADIENT TOOL FTW!
Sorry, guys; both are shooped. The kid has at least three hands in that picture, and the guy, the deer and the background are all under different light sources. Not to mention the thin light outline around the guy
The guy is standing on the stump. Apparently the deer’s neck is strung to some object not depicted. Because there is no way someone can hold an animal as large as that with just their hindlegs. So that raises the question, is this an act of bondage or just casual in nature?
Also, is the deer dead or alive? If not then the criminal charges could be altered. Necrophiliac to plain old unnatural sexual acts without the consent of the animal and also sodomizing the animal.
And as for pic #2, why the HELL are the dog’s eyes blurred?
Reason why someone would photoshop the second image: As mentioned by ‘Me’ at #26…someone figured it would be hilarious to make Adam look like a a creepy paedophile. Originally there may have been an attractive woman picking the dandelion, prompting Adam to post his semi-funny comment. That accounts for the adult hand in the image. Then afterward came the switch, for shock value only.
Now, if only we could identify that dog, we may be able to track down said attractive lady. But, alas.
I find photos and comments like these two the funniest on Lamebook (and blurring out the dog is a quality move!) but I don’t know why I bother reading the comments from you lot. Strange how a site dedicated to humour has drawn such a bunch of liberal lefty, boring, humourless members.
@Gank: I’m a Left of Centre Liberal and these pics hilarious as they challenge where the ‘line’ of social acceptability lies. Taking context into account, it is obvious that Adam does not really want to bone a kid as posting something like this and meaning it in a public forum would result in a lengthy jail term, however his shocking challenge to societal norms meant that I found it very funny. All the great, fresh, exciting comedians over the decades have challenged where the ‘line of acceptability’ is and nudged it as far as it can go.
The right wing is populated by conservatives and christians, and believe me, they want the line of acceptability pulling back to humourless biblical times. Come and join us on the Liberal Left – the jokes are better, we don’t have to go to church, the drug and alcohol fuelled parties are sweet and the better looking chicks are waaaaay more likely to do filthy things in bed.
The issue here is not left or right, but people getting a little too serious about interpreting a joke out of context.
The down side to joining this leftist utopia is you have to give up your manhood and become a pussy. That would rule out your point about hot chicks, cause they already have a pussy… they dont need another one. But congrats on being brave enough to point out how the “line of acceptability” has been pushed so far because of the left being such radicals and freedom fighters! you are a tool. Go look into suicide.
savage the downside of joing the conservative creationist mindcontrolled society is you have to accept that at one point during childhood you will be penetrated by brother John,Jack or Paul at your local church.
I’m not sure if that is where they really want it. I think you mean they want to pull it back to Puritan times. Bible times were pretty wild. Lots of parties over at the taxman’s house, women spiking guys in the head, and guys peeping at girls in the bath.
And as far as better looking girls. I’ve dated on both sides and the hairy unbathed commies are not nearly as appealing as the fresh well trimmed preppies. Either way, you have to over look the idealogy, one wants lots of goverment control and the other wants more more government control, and I just want to get laid.
@savageh: For a right winger, I am surprised that you are such a fan of recycling… recycling the “they don’t need another pussy” gag on this site is novel, especially as I have used that line in a previous post.
Don’t they say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery?
That’s not a fawn, that’s a full-grown doe. You can tell it is a doe (girl deer, for those of you who have never left the house or watched Discovery Channel or Bambi) because it does not have antlers. Or a penis.
there are 3 hands coming out of the kid and a big blur on the right side of the second picture… also where is the information of where this phot is from it has absolutely no captions but a big gap then a comment from this kid adam…on facebook there is always something in between the phot and the comment…right?
I’m confused to why people are taking these pictures seriously when both are clearly photoshopped. Really? No one noticed the missing person in the second picture where a large adult (probably female) hand is picking the flower? Or the fact that the color on the guy in the first picture is completely off from the rest of the picture?
Kenada made me laugh hard with the dog bit. lmao And what is it with the ‘It’s photoshopped because that pixel, this tree, those hands’ people? I feel sad for people who use lamebook to feel intelligent about themselves. lol
But not nearly as bad as Adam’s comment. I really hope this pediphile is reported and added to the sex offender registry before he has the opportunity to hurt someone. That comment is beyond tasteless. One would have to be screwed up in the head to even have a though like that cross their mind, much less to actually post it.
The dandelion picture with an adult person in the pic was posted on facebook, then Adam commented, then the person who posted the pic replaced it with the photoshopped version where the adult was replaced with the kid.
So it was just somebody trying to make Adam look like a dick.
Alternative theory is that somebody hacked his account and posted the comment out of spite, but I think it’s more likely that the pic was changed after he commented.
@seaborgiumJadee – It’s a doe. It has no nuts because it’s female. Fail. Though, as for what you think is pixelating, I thought so at first, but after looking at it a bit more, I doubt so. Just some good ol’ hanging fleshy stuff methinks.