At first I though no.3 said: ‘period monster. NOM NOM, no pad for me’ then I realised I’d read the caption wrong, then I realised that that didn’t make it any better …There’s just no need for that kind of shit
I have a baby girl and if she ever showed anything like this anyone on a public forum like f.b she’s gonna get beating. But Im gonna raise her to have some pride about herself and not be a dirty pig like this nasty bitch. Posting stuff like this just shows how poorly raised this girl is. This needs to stop! Facebook should send a squad out to eliminate the people that post stuff like this. First its dirty sheets, next its used/broken condoms and then afterbirth, little j.r sonofabitch’s first crap etc. People like this dont stop.
And that tree is awesome. Nature does have a sense of humour.
@15 yes its gross, and I’m not sure why anyone would post it let alone take a pic but begging for FB police and rambling about your daughter, your status updates would probably make me gag more than a little blood?? Move to Russia and stfu.
Tree is pure unadulterated win!! and the middle one is funny as hell too
Hey Gruss? Are you on the rag too? BTW I dont update about my kids dear. If they cure cancer then that may warrant a update. Want to be friends? I could use a few more humourless assholes on my friends list.
OIC now!! Sure Me, lets be friends I need some more folks on the list who are easily pissed off!!! I don’t understand why I’m humorless though? Did you say anything funny? the diatribe about how you would hit your kid if she took a pic of her period wasn’t funny.
Wasnt trying to be funny. I was being facetious though. Do you take all statements literally? And I dont get pissed off easily. I do have a intense hatred for stupid people like period girl. And its not so much the blood that made me “angry”, its the fact she posted it. And my kids will be brought up better. They will never be as nasty as to post things like this. Future/hypothetical beating averted. You on the other hand are still a humourless dick. Smootchies!
1.The tree is amazing. 2.Agreed…improper use of ironic is most likely the fault of Alanis Morrisette. This is not ironic, at all. 3. Should not be allowed on a public forum of any kind and just for the record, I thought it said NOM NOM too. Ewwwwwww!
menstrual art, eh? Do they make a profit from this? Next time leak week rolls around I might take some used sanitary towels down to the tate modern, tell them it I feel it reflects our disjointed, heavily ‘media’ saturated society and see if they’ll buy them off of me. I have seen worse things on display in there.
The tree isn’t that funny, my mate had a whole album on his phone of stuff like tthat, maybe it’s just because of that, but this isn’t that funny. I did like the second one though.
Number three… Wow, took me a second to read the caption, I though it was a nose bleed… NO! BLAM! Period power! In your FACE!
At least she isn’t pregnant, I guess.
From an important sequence of 72 works by a young, talented (and often controversial) artist, that explore at an often deeply personal level, the nature of intergenerational relationships.
Obliquely, the title refers to a young woman’s response to having been refused necessary sanitary protection from her own mother.
In this instance the mother’s denial of her child’s sexual maturity, and it’s inevitable result – bloodshed – can been seen to address issues not only at a family level, blah blah blah broader issues of conflict, sexuality, blah blah shame blah blah control. Blah blood blah allegory blah, deeply personal blah, motif, blah blah blah de blah.
Does anyone else think the third one is a mother taking a picture of her daughter’s sheets? She probably has a youngish daughter 12, 13, etc. who wouldn’t wear a pad one night even though her mom told her to. The next day while doing her laundry, she discovered the stain. Hence the, “NO MOM, NO PAD FOR ME.” Her mother is quoting her to show that she should have taken a pad. It’s taking, “I told you so!” to an extreme.
I really feel like that’s what’s going on, but most comments keep alluding to a girl taking photos of her own sheets, and I just don’t see that with the caption…
I am glad to see that the prices for “unique” works of art at the Tate Modern is not as outrageous as before – perhaps the credit crunch starting to tell. But I am still moved by the priceless descriptions to said items!
Way off topic, but thanks for the bold/italic/etc instructions of the other day. I did respond, though a few days late, so in case you missed that, thanks again!
@uhhhh: That makes sense. I think I didnt want to think a Mom could be that mean to her daughter. This Mom deserves a swift kick in the cootch if she did this. This is a public shaming that was both unnecessary and cruel.
[...] What do you think? Personally, all racial undertones aside, I find it funny only in the sense that the city didn’t think about the fail picture that could ensue by placing the signs as they did. [Source: Lamebook] [...]
No one is going to flock to your website more than once, just to see you taking screen captures of Lamebook and writing a paragraph explanation of what everyone already is saying.
“We here at Indyposted would label this NSFW, but imagine your boss trying to write you up for looking at a picture of trees having sex.”
You and your website is lame. I have a feeling that you’re going to steal a dozen more pictures from lamebook and failblog and just say things like “this is an odd and funny picture found at lamebook”, hoping to trick people into looking at your site.
It’s not going to work. So stop spamming the chat here!!!!
@mcowles hahahaha…mcowles doesn’t know how pingbacks work. They didn’t spam anything, Lamebook auto posted the pingbacks. Although I would agree more with you about them reposting if they didn’t attribute and had like a thousand pics up. I found 2, on the entire site. But I feel ya.