The weirdest thing about the whole situation (besides the wanking on a plane) is the mother’s reaction. If that was me, *especially* if I had a kid with me, as soon as I saw someone in the BR I would slam the door shut and walk calmly back to me seat.
What kind of freak has a kid with her, catches a guy with his dick in his hand, and decides the best course of action is to berate him?
at #s 16-17… your comments are too logical and boring. Lee probably isn’t guilty of indecent exposure as a matter of law. taking this out of context was the only thing that made this post worth reading.
If I had a dong and intended to do that, I would wear sweatpants, ask for a blanket, and do it in subtle strokes.
Damn you hole…damn you. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems that it would be easier for a guy to do it than a girl. because we have to spread a bit and dig right in, rather than it pointing up to salute and assist us. No spread necessary for them, really.
I agree with you antiaphrodite, he WAS in public, per say. But in the closed vicinity of a bathroom, an area that provides privacy.
The ‘waving of the dick’ discussion reminds me of the movie ‘Bruno’, with the focus group. That scene was one of the craziest, as one should expect in an SBC film.
Also, I don’t think the boss knew Lee was on FB, but that he went to his boss (probably a lawyer) for some ‘hypothetical’ advice…and then had to show his FB as proof so his boss wouldn’t think he was a pervert lmao
I’ll let you know. I’m not allowed visitors at the moment, what with the restraints and the hockey mask and having to type with a pencil held in my teeth.
I realise that’s just a saturday night for most of you but it’s life for me
Keona, we have the problem of what to do with the copious amount of stuff that comes out soaking our pants afterward. I am pretty sure you women wouldn’t have nearly as much liquid come out.
As to the ‘waving it around,’ I wouldn’t put it past some people. None of you have heard of the helicopter?
Sorry, got to call you on that one. If it refers to “Auto-erotic” activity, then the ‘self’ is redundant.
And, speaking as an englishmen, where the phrase originated, I’ve never heard self-waning used. Ever.
if you think I’m being pedantic, that’s my name!
I am HIGHLY pro-pedantry! And I agree that if it refers only to auto-erotic activity then ‘self’ is clearly redundant. However, I do not believe ‘wank’ only refers to autoerotic activity.
For evidence: My wife watched an interview with Kiera Knightly on the filming of Atonement. Knightly said that during the love scene, she was instructed to ‘wank it!’ by the director, apparently in reference to doing something to her lover. Thus ‘self-wanking’ would not be redundant.
I admit that otherwise, I’ve only ever heard ‘to wank’ used to refer to self-stimulation. And perhaps I misunderstood what I was told about Knightly’s report of what the director said to do.
I believe it is quite appropriate to the digital manipulation of another person as ‘wanking’ however I don’t believe you need to add the word ‘self’ when referring to your own masturbation. It is acceptable to use the word ‘wank’ without any prefix, regardless of whether you are referring to yourself or another person.
If you look in the dictionary Wank is defined as a) manipulation of the genitals by hand to achieve sexual climax (having a wank) or b) Anything written by Dan Brown eg The Da Vinci Code was a huge pile of wank
Perhaps I was mistaken in thinking that the ‘hand’ in ‘by hand’ could be someone else’s (e.g. ‘My wife gave me a wank in the car’). My point stands regardless. A man rich enough to own a plane could easily afford to bring along a woman to provide manual or other stimulation instead of having to give himself a wank.
I am glad to see another person who thinks Brown is full of shít.