#1 is only funny if you read it “What happened to John” “You mean Jina? Because John had his penis turned inside out and sewed into a crude orifice which vaguely resembles a vagina. Thus, John is now Jina”
@Dooky Smooth Buns – If John was born unto this world as a male, and it was God’s will for him to be born with a penis, then he is going against God’s will by turning his penis into a crude looking vagina. If God wanted John to have a vagina, He would have made it so himself.
I wasn’t sure what sort of robot it might be. Sometimes when I draw them, they might have other things instead of limbs/digits. Perhaps a saw for one arm and spatula for the other?
Think of Edward Scissorhands! Albeit he wasn’t a robot…
The Stanley Cup at GPP is one of those ideological scythes that try to carve society. You know a load of people are going to be pissed but it’s going to happen anyway so just deal with it. Rinse and repeat, until the same thing applies with homosexuality in general.
I support gay rights. But in terms of homophobia, I think it’s the best we can hope for.
but if john doesn’t believe in god, then it doesn’t matter what he does with his penis..
and yes, toasters toast bread, so alyssa should be asking, does bread toast bread? but none of that makes sense anyway, because if guns don’t kill people,people kill people then if toasters don’t toast bread people toast toast, right?
oh jesus i lost myself…
oh and, head injury + win = alcohol….?
If somebody is born with ambiguous genitals (which happens ALL THE TIME), and the doctors make a mistake in choosing the sex for the child (which also happens a lot), is that person destined for hell unless they choose a life of celibacy?
@alordslums – Given that the vast majority of human beings believe in a God or creator, your “agnosticism is the only way to go” is every bit as condescending and holier-than-thou as you accuse me of being. You’re essentially calling most of your fellow humans “deluded douches” since anyone who claims to be religious is (according to your standards) deluded.
It’s sad how the liberal agenda and takeover of higher education has poisoned the minds of so many. I do not take offense to your attacks on me. In fact, I welcome them. Perhaps when the reckoning comes and Jesus returns to Earth, you can recite to me some passages from your Richard Dawkins or Sam Harris book.
personally, I think that dan_fargis is fake. I can’t imagine that a person as… well… religious as he is would be on such a site and seriously comment all these posts. Shouldn’t something like this lead him streat to hell? Something like “don’t judge other people beause of some stupid things they wrote on facebook while being probably drunk or on drugs.”?
sry if all this is a bit confusing but it’s 3 am here and I should really go to sleep now. good night lamebook!
Seriously, if I could, I would punch Mister Dan Fargis in the face. Even if he is a troll (which I suspect he may very well be) he pisses me off.
Hope you’re happy that you’ve succeeded in being one of the most obnoxious people I’ve ever encountered, Dan.
at first I though yoink might be an idiot…but after comment #29 I’ve discovered he’s friggin fantastic! You are on your toes fella and I think you are missing your calling on some debate team or something….seriously, I’m not even being sarcastic. That fargis dudes brain is moldy and rotten and malfunctioning. You, however are sharp as a tack. I’m a jerk for having thought less of you.
I guess the fact that alcohol – win = – head injury
doesn’t make sense is because alcohol + head injury = win
is wrong, and hence, after rearranging the equation, it is still wrong.
Try this; alcohol + fail = head injury (because no one can argue with this logic)
Therefore alcohol – head injury = – fail
If we take – fail = win (using the laws of common sense) then;
alcohol – win = head injury
Hence I have proved that the original equation “alcohol + head injury = win” is wrong