oh yeah… because it prob took him 10-20 minutes to write it, he probably self submitted here and she figured out he was lying in probably under 10 seconds… soooo, thats a major fail… if a joke takes that long for maybe confusing someone for a few seconds then thats lame
*bites her lip and smiles at mcowles* um well actually I found your suggestion worth the try so I’ve been giving each nipple a 3 finger slap of vodka every day … it’s lead me to a “screaming orgasm” care to join me?
oh dear Lulz seems to again be marking her territory… you really should train her better mcowles …there ARE classes you can take her to so she knows her place and knows not to pee without your approval.
The biggest problem with Mark’s is it doesn’t even answer the question. She asked how to tag someone in a wall post, not how to make a wall post. Since she presumably already knows how to make a wall post, just not how to tag someone in it, she’ll know immediately that he’s having her on and probably not even read his entire comment.
He should have started out with plausible-sounding instructions and then slowly added more and more ridiculous stuff to it until it was obvious he was fucking with her. Ideally, she would get a little twinge in the back of her mind that maybe something wasn’t right relatively early on, but wouldn’t actually know for sure that she’s being had until the very last sentence.
cant wait for this one ” i’m the real mark and i totally didn’t self-submit! I didn’t even know about this stupid site until my friends told me i was on here. I’m going to fly there and punch you all. Screw you guys”
Maybe one of the girls was over at Marks for some post-sushi coitus, and they checked their facebook page and forgot to log-out, and then he jumped on the computer while she was taking a dump, and spotted a great chance for a foolproof self-submission that could never be traced back to him. Just sayin’
It says Remove Tag, so it’s either Mark, Christina or… the other girl that submitted this.
Whoever it was, it was still fucking lame. Sarcasm can be damn hilarious, when it’s used against someone who’s said or asked something fucking stupid. But when someone asks a legitimate question, and you waste shit-loads of your time writing some shitty sarcastic rant, for no reason, it just makes you look like a pathetic douche.
If some twat posted that on my wall in response to a perfectly acceptable question, I’d pay him a visit with my fist and a camera. I’d then hack into his account and change his profile picture to one him missing teeth and two black eyes. Knob head.
The world just divided into two kinds of people – those who find Mark’s response amusing and those who find it lame. While the first ones enjoyed 10 seconds of laugh, the second kind wasted the same 10 seconds for nothing. I think I know who’s the winning team here
I want the few seconds of my life back that it took to read Mark’s comment. I usually avoid long posts but I decided to give this one a try, but immediately regretted it. I hoped that it would turn funny at some point, but I only end up disappointed =(
bril·liant /ˈbrɪlyənt/ Show Spelled[bril-yuhnt] Show IPA
1.shining brightly; sparkling; glittering; lustrous: the brilliant lights of the city.
2.distinguished; illustrious: a brilliant performance by a young pianist.
3.having or showing great intelligence, talent, quality, etc.: a brilliant technician.
4.strong and clear in tone; vivid; bright: brilliant blues and greens; the brilliant sound of the trumpets.
5.splendid or magnificent: a brilliant social event.
6.Jewelry. a gem, esp. a diamond, having any of several varieties of the brilliant cut.
7.Printing. a size of type about 31/2-point.