This made my giggle at first, but I’m definitely on Shar’s side. Men are already sexist enough without us girls telling them how right they are just because they (or someone at Sickipedia, as it appears) took the trouble to put it in a smart way.
The “double standard” exists because it is seen as an achievement to get laid if you are a man. They have to coax a woman in, it’s hard work for them.
On the other hand all a woman has to do is open her legs and wait.
and also noone wants to hump a vagina like a bucket of porridge!
badsector, why did you have to specify “man” in front of the word hero?
If woman are so moronic I’d think they’re unlikely to be heroic right? For example what would be the point of saying “man mechanic”, because chicks don’t know shit about cars, right?
Brandon’s joke is funny, I lol’d, but people who take it seriously and actually agree with it are the problem. The importance placed on female purity is quite harmful for women in the same way that importance placed on male experience is harmful for men.
It’s a double standard that goes back to when a woman’s sexuality/virginity was the property of her father or husband.
Is it me or can anyone else see where Brandon’s analogy of lock and key goes? I’m getting a feeling that the recent remote keyless entry fad can be properly likened to watching porn and whacking off. Same result, no direct contact.
With women like these that are commenting on this post, it’s hardly surprising that some men believe women to be intelectually inferior. Good job jackasses.
I would ask all those uptight drama queens to let it rest, have a giggle at the metaphor and get it on with it! It would benefit woman-kind.
Awesome joke, but the point the girl (oh, I’m gonna look like a dick now because I don’t remember her name and am just gonna have to call her ‘the girl’) makes is still a good one. And I’m a guy. It seems like guys that sleep with everyone get tons of respect for it and (not exactly helping the women’s case) tons of girls begging to sleep with them. But a girl is a slut. It’s odd because a guy who’s slept with tons of women is seen as someone awesome and that makes some other women want him, but a girl is seen as a slut and that makes guys think she’s disgusting and would not want to sleep with her.
Maybe it’s just the difference between how guys and girls see each other.
Also, it does make me laugh, something someone else here mentioned… all the people on the internet who act like proper sexist men and are all “get in the kitchen and make me a sammich” who never would in real life. T’internet brings out the worst in people.
I know, I’m no fun. Deal with it.
Did laugh, though.
Let’s look at the lock and key analogy a different way. No matter how many locks a key opens, that key will always remain the same, never changing the length or width.
However, if a lock is opened by many different keys, eventually it will start to get worn out and eventually broken. Depending on the size of the keys that are opening it, the locking mechanism can get widened to the point that even the most average size key won’t be able to open it properly.
So, to put it bluntly, a guy can fuck a hundred women and his dick will never change. A woman can fuck a hundred guys and her pussy will get all streched out to the point that she needs John Holmes as a lover just to not feel like there’s a hotdog in the hallway. never mind that the more sex she has, the more the pussy looks it was put through a taffy puller. The guy’s dick will look the same as the day he popped his first cherry.
No matter its origins I still got a chuckle. Some of life’s Truisms bear repeating.
note to @Spanky who said “So, to put it bluntly, a guy can fuck a hundred women and his dick will never change.”
Uh yeah, the mans member will never change, if you don’t count the weeping oozing pustules from all the STDs he’s gonna get from running around indiscriminately dropping his “key” into hundreds of well used “locks”.
Spanky- Your analogy fails. If a woman has sex with a 100 different men or has sex 100 times with the same man, her pussy will still change physically. It’s not as if having sex with only one man 100 times will keep her pussy perfectly tight.
How is this a double standard? It’s apples to oranges.
Since men pursue, and women are pursued, men will as a gender never be in the same position as women. Until the day comes where men always bring their best friend to the bathroom with them, or dance in exclusively male groups on the dancefloor, men will not be pursued like women are. It’s different.
It takes no skill to allow a guy to have sex with you. It does take integrity, loyalty, sense, and dignity to deny all men. However, it takes plenty of skill for a man to sleep with plenty of women. May be disgusting, but it takes skill. Being a slut is “easy” hence why we call them that.
So if this “double standard” only applies to sluts, why are self proclaimed intelligent women fighting for this? If you despise this male behaviour, why are you trying to justify it for your gender? Nobody said men weren’t sluts. However, to be a slut requires skill if you’re a man since you’re the one trying to win her over. That skill gains praise smong men
@spanky – the vagina is a muscle. It stretches and then tightens back up, pretty much. The only thing on earth that can really stretch it out for any length of time is a fucking baby going down the birth canal, and then it returns to pretty much normal after a while.
In other words, there is no dick on this entire earth that could possibly be big enough to have any impact on a vagina.
Face it, you guys are just scared she’ll know how crappy you are at sex if she’s had time to get good at it herself.
That was a very clever comment Brandon, however still sexist. Surley if its about “locks” and “keys” then surley a universal or master key should be in the right hands. Who knows what would happen if some sexist brutes were the owners of the “master key”.
There is no “master key” and there are some locks which can be opened by many keys. Take a key down to the key cutters and he can make you exact replicas which fit your lock. These aren’t “shitty” locks, its just easier to have spare keys lying around , you know? I’ve certainy seen people break alot more keys , than locks. So it wasn’t a flawless metaphor.
“When are people going to stop proclaiming this double standard like it’s a profound new way of seeing the world?”
As soon as we stop having teenagers. Every old idea is new to them. That’s not a bad thing. It -was- a profound new way of seeing the world the first time you heard it. The same is true for them. They can’t and shouldn’t be expected to be omniscient.