<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holy Stripe!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/</link>
	<description>From Lame to Fame</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amywonder</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-61122</link>
		<dc:creator>amywonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-61122</guid>
		<description>old post.. but thats because in aust our religion apparently revolves around southern cross tatts and unit stickers

ugh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>old post.. but thats because in aust our religion apparently revolves around southern cross tatts and unit stickers</p>
<p>ugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jae</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-56730</link>
		<dc:creator>jae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-56730</guid>
		<description>Wow, here in Aust there is never religious updates to our facebooks... I suppose we are just a way less godly country...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, here in Aust there is never religious updates to our facebooks&#8230; I suppose we are just a way less godly country&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-53215</link>
		<dc:creator>bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-53215</guid>
		<description>jeremy. you are my fucking hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeremy. you are my fucking hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-45799</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-45799</guid>
		<description>OK so I had a rough day today so I smoked a nice spliff after work and found this hilarious website. Then i checked out the comments on some posts and came to this one which started out typically and then the atheist debate was interesting and the religious folk were present making there case (lol) and then i was sober and wondering what the FUCK I HAD BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST 2 HOURS???!?!!!? what are we all doing here? life is bizare folks that&#039;s all i can say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK so I had a rough day today so I smoked a nice spliff after work and found this hilarious website. Then i checked out the comments on some posts and came to this one which started out typically and then the atheist debate was interesting and the religious folk were present making there case (lol) and then i was sober and wondering what the FUCK I HAD BEEN DOING FOR THE PAST 2 HOURS???!?!!!? what are we all doing here? life is bizare folks that&#8217;s all i can say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-43853</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-43853</guid>
		<description>@everyone in regards to the last comment: let us all worship the name of FOD for what he says is good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@everyone in regards to the last comment: let us all worship the name of FOD for what he says is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FOD</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-43444</link>
		<dc:creator>FOD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-43444</guid>
		<description>How could any of you possibly think that anyone cares about your take on whether God exists? You are an atheist? Wow, no one cares.

You are a Christian? Wow, no one cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could any of you possibly think that anyone cares about your take on whether God exists? You are an atheist? Wow, no one cares.</p>
<p>You are a Christian? Wow, no one cares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look at it this way</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-37874</link>
		<dc:creator>Look at it this way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-37874</guid>
		<description>#75.  Yeh, name one.  Between them, those two authors have demolished Augustine &quot;proofs&quot; and all that ridiculous ID stuff.

As an atheist, I do not claim Christians are clueless, cluelessness knows no borders.  As I said before, the theist Aaron seems interesting and well informed, the theist Vincent seems like a clueless twat.  And there are plenty of idiot atheists around too.

Incidentally, what do you think was the &quot;central argument&quot; of the God Delusion?  Atheists don&#039;t need to prove that god does not exist, they just need to debunk the arguments that he does.  Similarly, creationists don&#039;t need to prove that evolution is wrong, scientists need to prove that it is right.  The null hypothesis stands until the alternative is proven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#75.  Yeh, name one.  Between them, those two authors have demolished Augustine &#8220;proofs&#8221; and all that ridiculous ID stuff.</p>
<p>As an atheist, I do not claim Christians are clueless, cluelessness knows no borders.  As I said before, the theist Aaron seems interesting and well informed, the theist Vincent seems like a clueless twat.  And there are plenty of idiot atheists around too.</p>
<p>Incidentally, what do you think was the &#8220;central argument&#8221; of the God Delusion?  Atheists don&#8217;t need to prove that god does not exist, they just need to debunk the arguments that he does.  Similarly, creationists don&#8217;t need to prove that evolution is wrong, scientists need to prove that it is right.  The null hypothesis stands until the alternative is proven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grashnak</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-37723</link>
		<dc:creator>Grashnak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-37723</guid>
		<description>@75
You&#039;re kidding right?  The strongest agruments for theism?  Name one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@75<br />
You&#8217;re kidding right?  The strongest agruments for theism?  Name one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not this again</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-37505</link>
		<dc:creator>not this again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-37505</guid>
		<description>#63 and #64

If either of you truly knew anything about theism and atheism, you&#039;d know that when it comes to philosophy and theology, Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens are hacks.

Dawkins is a biologist, and &quot;The God Delusion&quot; avoided almost all of the central (and strongest) arguments for theism.  His central argument in his book was laughably inconclusive, and did not in any way, prove that God does not exist.  He&#039;s an expert in biology, no doubt, but in the realm of philosophy he has no chance.

Hitchens, on the other hand is a JOURNALIST.  His book, &quot;God is not Great&quot; centrally appeals to what is known as &quot;the problem of evil,&quot; a subject that is more or less not debated anymore as it no longer has any worth for the atheist to press against the theist.  God and evil can coexist.

Hitchens actually debated William Lane Craig, a noted Christian philosopher a number of months ago, and Hitchens&#039; performance was absolutely embarrassing, appealing mostly to satire and anger to attempt to convince audience members of his point.

Sorry, but neither of these guys have a clue.

Quentin Smith, a noted atheist, has himself even expressed his dissatisfaction with Dawkins attempt to enter into the world of philosophy.  Basically called him a fool.

So many atheists claim that Christians are clueless.  Beware, that shoe fits just as well on your feet too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#63 and #64</p>
<p>If either of you truly knew anything about theism and atheism, you&#8217;d know that when it comes to philosophy and theology, Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens are hacks.</p>
<p>Dawkins is a biologist, and &#8220;The God Delusion&#8221; avoided almost all of the central (and strongest) arguments for theism.  His central argument in his book was laughably inconclusive, and did not in any way, prove that God does not exist.  He&#8217;s an expert in biology, no doubt, but in the realm of philosophy he has no chance.</p>
<p>Hitchens, on the other hand is a JOURNALIST.  His book, &#8220;God is not Great&#8221; centrally appeals to what is known as &#8220;the problem of evil,&#8221; a subject that is more or less not debated anymore as it no longer has any worth for the atheist to press against the theist.  God and evil can coexist.</p>
<p>Hitchens actually debated William Lane Craig, a noted Christian philosopher a number of months ago, and Hitchens&#8217; performance was absolutely embarrassing, appealing mostly to satire and anger to attempt to convince audience members of his point.</p>
<p>Sorry, but neither of these guys have a clue.</p>
<p>Quentin Smith, a noted atheist, has himself even expressed his dissatisfaction with Dawkins attempt to enter into the world of philosophy.  Basically called him a fool.</p>
<p>So many atheists claim that Christians are clueless.  Beware, that shoe fits just as well on your feet too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look at it this way</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35822</link>
		<dc:creator>Look at it this way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35822</guid>
		<description>Happy to be a heathen then :)

The debate seems like it may be on the verge of getting definitional, and those debates bore me to tears, so I&#039;m ejecting, though I will reiterate my rejection of your assertion that I just need to have a little faith.  Anyway, you seem like a sensible and witty kind of guy Aaron, have a good life.

Vincent, you seem like a fuckwit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy to be a heathen then <img src='http://www.lamebook.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The debate seems like it may be on the verge of getting definitional, and those debates bore me to tears, so I&#8217;m ejecting, though I will reiterate my rejection of your assertion that I just need to have a little faith.  Anyway, you seem like a sensible and witty kind of guy Aaron, have a good life.</p>
<p>Vincent, you seem like a fuckwit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: something</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35784</link>
		<dc:creator>something</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35784</guid>
		<description>Um, &quot;A little amazed,&quot; you need a sense of humor and you won&#039;t find one in a book.  It&#039;s not funny because Alexis used &quot;stripe.&quot;  It&#039;s funny because Ian &quot;lol&quot;-ed at Jesus being whipped.

Oh that?!?! Yeah, hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, &#8220;A little amazed,&#8221; you need a sense of humor and you won&#8217;t find one in a book.  It&#8217;s not funny because Alexis used &#8220;stripe.&#8221;  It&#8217;s funny because Ian &#8220;lol&#8221;-ed at Jesus being whipped.</p>
<p>Oh that?!?! Yeah, hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little amazed</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35747</link>
		<dc:creator>A little amazed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35747</guid>
		<description>so, I&#039;m guessing no one around here owns a dictionary.  Or is independently literate.

Otherwise you might know that a &quot;welt, long scar, or wound,&quot; is an acceptable, if old, definition of stripe.

I&#039;m so disappointed in you, Lamebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, I&#8217;m guessing no one around here owns a dictionary.  Or is independently literate.</p>
<p>Otherwise you might know that a &#8220;welt, long scar, or wound,&#8221; is an acceptable, if old, definition of stripe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so disappointed in you, Lamebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35724</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35724</guid>
		<description>#69 - I was being tongue-in-cheek with the faith idea. To believe wholly in rationalism, you need to believe that there is nothing else in the world save for rationalism. Agnosticism is more what you&#039;re thinking of, there&#039;s no concrete evidence for, but then, there&#039;s nothing definitively against, either. Simply the will to believe, or not believe.

Oh, I agree that imposing beliefs is wrong - I think if people are to believe in God, they have to come to it on their own time, on their own terms, walking their own path of belief. I also believe in the abilities of reason - if there&#039;s a tenement of my faith, a value I&#039;m supposed to hold, that doesn&#039;t stand up to reason, I don&#039;t hold it. =P God being the one thing beyond rational proof, it&#039;s simply a matter of &quot;yes&quot; or &quot;no&quot;. You have free will, you&#039;re perfectly allowed to make that choice.

And trust me, if someone tried to use God to justify a false or crappy law, I&#039;d be right there knocking it down, too.

PS: They&#039;re not bad, but that&#039;s just proof you&#039;re a heathen. =P I listen more to progressive music, along with death/black metal, myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#69 &#8211; I was being tongue-in-cheek with the faith idea. To believe wholly in rationalism, you need to believe that there is nothing else in the world save for rationalism. Agnosticism is more what you&#8217;re thinking of, there&#8217;s no concrete evidence for, but then, there&#8217;s nothing definitively against, either. Simply the will to believe, or not believe.</p>
<p>Oh, I agree that imposing beliefs is wrong &#8211; I think if people are to believe in God, they have to come to it on their own time, on their own terms, walking their own path of belief. I also believe in the abilities of reason &#8211; if there&#8217;s a tenement of my faith, a value I&#8217;m supposed to hold, that doesn&#8217;t stand up to reason, I don&#8217;t hold it. =P God being the one thing beyond rational proof, it&#8217;s simply a matter of &#8220;yes&#8221; or &#8220;no&#8221;. You have free will, you&#8217;re perfectly allowed to make that choice.</p>
<p>And trust me, if someone tried to use God to justify a false or crappy law, I&#8217;d be right there knocking it down, too.</p>
<p>PS: They&#8217;re not bad, but that&#8217;s just proof you&#8217;re a heathen. =P I listen more to progressive music, along with death/black metal, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look at it this way.</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35705</link>
		<dc:creator>Look at it this way.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35705</guid>
		<description>PS, the White Stripes are awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS, the White Stripes are awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look at it this way.</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35704</link>
		<dc:creator>Look at it this way.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35704</guid>
		<description>#68 Yeh, but I was an atheist before it was cool!

By the way, you obviously don&#039;t comprehend atheism.  We don&#039;t stand on &quot;shaky ground&quot; at all.  We are a-theists, not anti-theists.  We take the rational approach that claims of god need evidence, otherwise the claims are as worthless as the exceptionally thin paper they are written on.  We represent the null hypothesis, not a different alternative hypothesis.  Different alternative hypotheses are presented by other religions.

And I can quite happily tolerate the idea of something (i assume you mean someone) that disagrees with me.  In fact, I quite enjoy the debates.  Interesting that you say atheists are trying to impose their &quot;beliefs&quot; on other people, IMMEDIATELY after you say &quot;they just need to have a little faith&quot;.  Hypocritical much?   I don&#039;t need a little faith, I&#039;m doing perfectly well without it, thanks very much.  

Trying to impose beliefs is pointless anyway.  If your mind was open to rational thought, you would reach rational conclusions all by your little old self.  Keep your faith, I don&#039;t mind at all.  But if you venture into the secular world trying to impose faith-based ideas upon me, I will try my hardest to slap you down.  Yay for martyrdom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#68 Yeh, but I was an atheist before it was cool!</p>
<p>By the way, you obviously don&#8217;t comprehend atheism.  We don&#8217;t stand on &#8220;shaky ground&#8221; at all.  We are a-theists, not anti-theists.  We take the rational approach that claims of god need evidence, otherwise the claims are as worthless as the exceptionally thin paper they are written on.  We represent the null hypothesis, not a different alternative hypothesis.  Different alternative hypotheses are presented by other religions.</p>
<p>And I can quite happily tolerate the idea of something (i assume you mean someone) that disagrees with me.  In fact, I quite enjoy the debates.  Interesting that you say atheists are trying to impose their &#8220;beliefs&#8221; on other people, IMMEDIATELY after you say &#8220;they just need to have a little faith&#8221;.  Hypocritical much?   I don&#8217;t need a little faith, I&#8217;m doing perfectly well without it, thanks very much.  </p>
<p>Trying to impose beliefs is pointless anyway.  If your mind was open to rational thought, you would reach rational conclusions all by your little old self.  Keep your faith, I don&#8217;t mind at all.  But if you venture into the secular world trying to impose faith-based ideas upon me, I will try my hardest to slap you down.  Yay for martyrdom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35664</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35664</guid>
		<description>Wow, atheism must be like the new black: the new cool, hip, and happening thing to do. I feel so horribly out of date with my belief in God, whatever am I going to do? 

I find a lot of atheists stand on a lot of shaky ground for their beliefs. Can&#039;t tolerate the idea of something that disagrees with them. I guess they just need to have a little faith and stop trying to impose their beliefs on other people, hm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, atheism must be like the new black: the new cool, hip, and happening thing to do. I feel so horribly out of date with my belief in God, whatever am I going to do? </p>
<p>I find a lot of atheists stand on a lot of shaky ground for their beliefs. Can&#8217;t tolerate the idea of something that disagrees with them. I guess they just need to have a little faith and stop trying to impose their beliefs on other people, hm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notthemessaiah</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35452</link>
		<dc:creator>notthemessaiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35452</guid>
		<description>Jessi, I would just like to point out that I&#039;m not an atheist. I believe in God. Just not the orthodox Judaeo-Christian God. My God has horns and likes it when you get drunk and dance naked round the fire widdershins and eat virgins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jessi, I would just like to point out that I&#8217;m not an atheist. I believe in God. Just not the orthodox Judaeo-Christian God. My God has horns and likes it when you get drunk and dance naked round the fire widdershins and eat virgins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessi</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35321</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35321</guid>
		<description>Wow, is there some kind of atheist party going on in here?  Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, is there some kind of atheist party going on in here?  Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thesaurapist 13(F)</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-35010</link>
		<dc:creator>Thesaurapist 13(F)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-35010</guid>
		<description>Christianity. 
&quot;The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree . . . 
Yeah, makes perfect sense.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christianity.<br />
&#8220;The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree . . .<br />
Yeah, makes perfect sense.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look at at this way.</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34910</link>
		<dc:creator>Look at at this way.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34910</guid>
		<description>Nice point, #63

The God Delusion, by Dawkins, is excellent.  I also recommend God is not Great, by Hitchens.

I&#039;m going to go and update my status right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice point, #63</p>
<p>The God Delusion, by Dawkins, is excellent.  I also recommend God is not Great, by Hitchens.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go and update my status right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notthemessaiah</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34893</link>
		<dc:creator>notthemessaiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34893</guid>
		<description>Any of my friends posted such lame arsed crap on their wall then i would have to deny them, 3 times as the cock crows and then have them flogged and crucified. PS 62 D, good look with the creationist baiting, practically anything by Richard Dawkins will do, why don&#039;t you become fb friends with them too. You could post little extracts of it on their wall every day just to be a complete twat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any of my friends posted such lame arsed crap on their wall then i would have to deny them, 3 times as the cock crows and then have them flogged and crucified. PS 62 D, good look with the creationist baiting, practically anything by Richard Dawkins will do, why don&#8217;t you become fb friends with them too. You could post little extracts of it on their wall every day just to be a complete twat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34865</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34865</guid>
		<description>@61, agreed.

I will mock anybody I damn well please.  There&#039;s a creationist in my history class this semester.  I&#039;m thinking of buying him a book on evolution to explain it to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@61, agreed.</p>
<p>I will mock anybody I damn well please.  There&#8217;s a creationist in my history class this semester.  I&#8217;m thinking of buying him a book on evolution to explain it to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Look at at this way.</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34848</link>
		<dc:creator>Look at at this way.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34848</guid>
		<description>#8 and #9

I disagree entirely.  Anyone who has faith weak enough to be destroyed by mocking doesn&#039;t really have faith.  Any god who is shaken by mocking does not deserve to be worshipped.  Any god that can be destroyed, should be destroyed.  And even Hillary Clinton knows that no argument of religious sensitivity should be used curtail freedom of speech.  

Besides, most religions claim that all other gods are false, which is blasphemous in the context of those other religions.  The mere act of identifying with one religion implicitly mocks the others.  Calling jesus the messiah instead of just a prophet is heresy in islam and judaism.  The only difference between atheists and Christians is that Christians reject 99% of all gods and atheists reject 100%.  We are 99% in agreement.

I&#039;ll mock what I choose to mock.  Telling me I can&#039;t do that denies my right to freedom of speech.  My mocking your religion denies you nothing.  You be religious and I&#039;ll be blasphemous.  Then we should all be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#8 and #9</p>
<p>I disagree entirely.  Anyone who has faith weak enough to be destroyed by mocking doesn&#8217;t really have faith.  Any god who is shaken by mocking does not deserve to be worshipped.  Any god that can be destroyed, should be destroyed.  And even Hillary Clinton knows that no argument of religious sensitivity should be used curtail freedom of speech.  </p>
<p>Besides, most religions claim that all other gods are false, which is blasphemous in the context of those other religions.  The mere act of identifying with one religion implicitly mocks the others.  Calling jesus the messiah instead of just a prophet is heresy in islam and judaism.  The only difference between atheists and Christians is that Christians reject 99% of all gods and atheists reject 100%.  We are 99% in agreement.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll mock what I choose to mock.  Telling me I can&#8217;t do that denies my right to freedom of speech.  My mocking your religion denies you nothing.  You be religious and I&#8217;ll be blasphemous.  Then we should all be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A theist</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34835</link>
		<dc:creator>A theist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34835</guid>
		<description>We can do evil things together, like sanction homosexual unions, dishonour our parents, look at porn on the internet and take the lord&#039;s name in vain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can do evil things together, like sanction homosexual unions, dishonour our parents, look at porn on the internet and take the lord&#8217;s name in vain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A theist</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34831</link>
		<dc:creator>A theist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34831</guid>
		<description>^ Awesome, I&#039;ll meet you between the torture racks and the burning brimstone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Awesome, I&#8217;ll meet you between the torture racks and the burning brimstone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tootsie</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34828</link>
		<dc:creator>Tootsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34828</guid>
		<description>Do you think when Jesus was being crucified, he was thinking about how one day, someone would post about it on Facebook?

Seriously people, get over it. This is Lamebook, we make fun of EVERYTHING here. Especially when people give credit for their own hard work and success to some invisible guy in the sky. THAT&#039;S lame.

Boy, I hope I&#039;m right and Hell doesn&#039;t exist, because if not, I&#039;m surely going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think when Jesus was being crucified, he was thinking about how one day, someone would post about it on Facebook?</p>
<p>Seriously people, get over it. This is Lamebook, we make fun of EVERYTHING here. Especially when people give credit for their own hard work and success to some invisible guy in the sky. THAT&#8217;S lame.</p>
<p>Boy, I hope I&#8217;m right and Hell doesn&#8217;t exist, because if not, I&#8217;m surely going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A theist</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34814</link>
		<dc:creator>A theist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34814</guid>
		<description>The worst thing about holy communion is that the priest never asks if you want thigh or breast meat.

If there is a hell, I guess I&#039;m going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst thing about holy communion is that the priest never asks if you want thigh or breast meat.</p>
<p>If there is a hell, I guess I&#8217;m going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A theist</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34812</link>
		<dc:creator>A theist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34812</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s so cool about a cult of ritualised cannibalism anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s so cool about a cult of ritualised cannibalism anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perfidious_albion</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34772</link>
		<dc:creator>perfidious_albion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34772</guid>
		<description>53: Word

And why do you suppose they are so precious about it anyway? Why does it &#039;deserve&#039; respect, over and above, say, belief in the Tooth Fairy to those of us who don&#039;t believe in it?

And we&#039;re not worried about catching christianity through facebook, thanks. But since you guys seem so desperate to remind the rest of us constantly about what you believe - is it cos you MIGHT catch atheism off the internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>53: Word</p>
<p>And why do you suppose they are so precious about it anyway? Why does it &#8216;deserve&#8217; respect, over and above, say, belief in the Tooth Fairy to those of us who don&#8217;t believe in it?</p>
<p>And we&#8217;re not worried about catching christianity through facebook, thanks. But since you guys seem so desperate to remind the rest of us constantly about what you believe &#8211; is it cos you MIGHT catch atheism off the internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.lamebook.com/holy-stripe/comment-page-2/#comment-34663</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamebook.com/?p=3644#comment-34663</guid>
		<description>statuses*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>statuses*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

