Comments on: Happilee Married

By: den

den — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:35:59 +0000

Actually, she responded with two, not one.

By: Najma

Najma — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:52:07 +0000

I love that after that endless bull shit from Andy, Carla responded with ONE sentence, making it very clear that she doesn’t give a shit about him and kindly reminding him of her marriage.
As for Lee, though I could go on and on about how he had every right to say what he said, I’d just like to say one thing: WIN.

By: mantherz

mantherz — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:05:57 +0000

Just throwing this out there: Penny Lane does NOT speak for all women. Certainly not for me. If I was Carla, I would have felt disrespected, so I certainly wouldn’t blame my husband if he did too! (So no, Matt, I don’t think you’re an “ape” for feeling disrespected when you have every right to).

I’ve gotten douchey letters like this (though thankfully none as verbose), and no, I was not sympathetic. “Awww, poor dear, just wants to apologize to me, wish me luck in my current relationship….and ask me out.” Riiiiight.

I would be more likely to believe that Andy was truly sorry if:

1. he had given her the respect of referring to her as MARRIED. Maybe I didn’t read enough of these comments, but I can’t believe no one mentioned the fact that he referred to her as “engaged” instead of “married”. Unless she just happened to be having her wedding at the exact time he was writing this thesis paper, that sounds deliberate, and really rude. Oh, but I’m sure it was *just* an oversight. Because a creep like Andy who spends pages upon pages describing how “cunningly innocent but with a dark side” she is didn’t once give her profile a quick glance. Sure.

2. he wouldn’t have ASKED HER OUT ON A DATE.

I personally thought Lee’s response was funny, and completely NOT uncalled for. If I was Carla, I would have shown my husband. Not because I’m a “damsel in distress”, but because it would have irritated me, but I still would have been amused by how pathetic it is and would have wanted to have someone to share a laugh with. And if my boyfriend had responded like Lee, I would have laughed even harder. Sorry, but for those of you who think Carla should have “responded nicely”…you’ve obviously never dealt with people like Andy. Being nice – even if you’re blowing them off – comes off as some invitation to keep bothering you.

Well, now that this comment has become about as long as Andy’s letter, I’ll end it with this: “Team Carla & Lee! (and Matt)”

By: DaRoosta

DaRoosta — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 07:53:20 +0000

HOLY SHIT!!! That part about “I’ll meet you for coffee sometime” made me realize how hilarious this entire thing is. I figured the husband would say something like “I’m gonna kick your ass” or some shit, but he actually worked his threat into the lame ass letter lol.

By: November 2009 Beta Of The Month « Roissy in DC

November 2009 Beta Of The Month « Roissy in DC — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:39:22 +0000

[...] November 2009 BOTM Candidate #2 was submitted by Ross W. Have you ever wondered what happens when an inborn beta becomes a little too aggressively creepy in his pursuit of a taken woman? Well now, thanks to Lamebook, you can read a stellar example of just such a specimen. [...]

By: Shan

Shan — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:24:00 +0000

Ooops, make that “indicating it’s a message”, not “wall post”.

By: Shan

Shan — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:23:12 +0000

It looks like the husband answered first because the husband was writing a message, not a response to a wall post. Look at the postings. The original one doesn’t say “Between [HIM] and You”, which indicates it’s a wall post. However, the husband’s post DOES say “Between [HIM] and You”, indicating it is a wall post.

By: ME

ME — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:19:01 +0000

Hours of the post don’t match: The husband answered before Carla…

By: Anastasia from Russia

Anastasia from Russia — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:57:26 +0000

@ Brendon C

Well said. And if you’re indeed 19 y.o., then you’re an awesome 19. When I was as young as that, I’d probably have believed “self-writhe” was a real word.

By: care

care — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:33:42 +0000

First of all: I didn’t read the comments. If mine overlap, I apologize.

Yes, Andrew is lame. He’s whiny and melodramatic and trying to “re-connect” with a married woman.

However, the people who posted this here on Lamebook are self-important twats. What does a random apology from a lame ex have to do with anything? If he’s really as irrelevant as the woman claims, why post this? Random, lame apologies from exes aren’t a symptom of Facebook in particular… no one cares that your wife’s ex boyfriend is actually desperate enough to go for your wife.