Comments on: God Squad

By: Screw the starving children, God’s got to fix computers - Rantings of a New Yorker

Sun, 07 Nov 2010 13:18:48 +0000

[...] Screw the starving children, God’s got to fix computers Nov.07, 2010 in Christianity HE is NEVER too busy for ANYONE [...]

By: DrBones

DrBones — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:26:50 +0000

No, what people forget to think about is that God is an imaginary being for whose existence there is not one single shred of tangible evidence. Not. One. Shred.

And if, somehow, I’m wrong and He *is* real, He’s got some pretty weird priorities.

Just sayin’

By: burndalite

burndalite — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:44:02 +0000

What most people forget to think about is that the belief in God is something that happens for each individual person in different ways, just because you don’t understand doesn’t mean that they are the ones that are stupid. Also, God has given each of us an ability to make the world a better place in his name, if there are starving children then we aren’t doing our part; a relationship is give and take.

In the end people are going to believe whatever they choose to believe, to have an argument about it is folly. When we die we will know what was the truth all along.

By: aleesh87

aleesh87 — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:06:28 +0000

lolololol ‘thank you daddy god’ what does that even mean!

By: llama

llama — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:50:04 +0000

squirrel*.

By: llama

llama — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:49:49 +0000

We are the retarded offspring of five monkeys having butt-sex with a fish-squirrell.

By: Gertz

Gertz — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:16:36 +0000

God, Jesus, Baby Jesus, Daddy God – all very much overrated. Who says (or what says) God/Jesus – and the like – is male! How sexist. He could be a she and could be sick of fixing all the shit that happens. As a very PROUD ATHEIST I am so over the bullshit of religion and applaud the comments with ‘comic’ abundance. You cannot mention anything about religion without having an argument. Worse still, if you are an atheist – you are the worst in the world and Satan will eat you up like a nice hamburger. Awesome. If I can’t go to heaven because I use the ‘lords name in vain’ or some shit then fuck it, I am going to hell! It’s better there I hear. Oh, and my PC needs fixing.

By: WOG

WOG — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:11:41 +0000

I wonder why god chose to mess with her hard drive in the first place.

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:14:44 +0000

He should be thanking God that Tech support actually arrived!

By: FiscalFizz

FiscalFizz — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:11:03 +0000

the people arguing on lamebook are usually more funny than the actually facebook fails featured here. You guys are fucking laaaaameeeee

By: Faint

Faint — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:00:16 +0000

@Trent: All Atheists? You wouldn’t be making an overarching generalization about Atheists would you?

Nah… no-one would call out someone like that, then do the exact same thing… would they?

By: Trent

Trent — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:29:56 +0000

@Zarggg: Always huh? No I haven’t noticed that, actually. Ever notice how all atheists everywhere make overarching generalizations about religious types all the time?

By: Zarggg

Zarggg — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:33:35 +0000

Ever notice that the religious crazies are always typing in all-caps, usually with horrible grammar and spelling, and constantly use repeated punctuation, often inappropriately?

By: Dee

Dee — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:38:21 +0000

Fibonacci -
No wonder my vagina smelled like coleslaw.

By: KingNeckbeard

KingNeckbeard — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:57:23 +0000

You guys are dumb, praying DOES work.

When I was little my Mother grounded me for a bad reason. I sat in my bed and prayed and prayed that she would see the error of her ways. Just as I finished, I felt a beautiful calm surround me, like the weight of the world was just taken off my shoulders. Then God gave my Mom AIDS and I wasn’t grounded any more.

By: pedobear

pedobear — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:06:15 +0000

I find it strange that some people are more likely to believe that an invisible, omnipotent entity is a more feasable explanation for something going wrong or right than a shitty technician, doctor, etc…

By: me

me — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:54:51 +0000

God is about as real as the tooth fairy, the end.

I enjoy not being delusional.

By: Fibonacci

Fibonacci — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:51:17 +0000

I’ll debate religion wherever I feel like it. Fuck you.

By: supabur

supabur — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:40:10 +0000

is nice to see this place is full of retarded god lovers that have nothing else to do.

bottom line the entry is funny and you god fearing twats go somewhere else to debate religion

By: Tristan

Tristan — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:07:47 +0000

Sean is FTW. End of story.

By: flips

flips — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:56:48 +0000

@25, @29, @37, @44, @52
Hahahahahahaha

@65
Agreed

@70
Great quote

Then I got to the God debate and gave up reading.

By: Fibonacci

Fibonacci — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:28:12 +0000

#138 What’s a dick sack?

By: 2.718

2.718 — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:24:25 +0000

^ Thanks, I appreciate the help

By: 2.718

2.718 — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:00:07 +0000

I don’t have anything else to say, but I thought I would give you another free shot to help highlight how poorly the new policy is working.

By: ln(1)=0

ln(1)=0 — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:56:33 +0000

Great. A moderation policy that allows abusive name thieves, but does not allow me to post under my chose name. Brilliant

By: logarithm

logarithm — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:53:21 +0000

Whatever the policy is, it need to be published and it needs a considerable amount of work to stop the idiots.

By: also known as "e"

also known as "e" — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:50:50 +0000

And why allow the obscene imitators, if you are going to the trouble of reviewing the comments?

By: natural log

natural log — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:48:48 +0000

I there is a new moderation policy, why not publish it so we can make an effort to stay within the rules?

By: ln (x)

ln (x) — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:47:10 +0000

If you are going to reject comments, admn, why did you accept the two above that are obscene and take my name?

By: 713821828359452353

713821828359452353 — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:45:24 +0000

I guess not. Just the previous 4.