Monday, April 11, 2011

Folk It!

previous post: Wonderful Wins!

RELATED POSTS:


30 Comments

  1. Aw that poor baby! The actual baby, not the two parents.

  2. MsBuzzkillington

    Dang, a little critical of the baby are we? Poor thing.

  3. The poor baby does have his nose…

  4. That poor child; she’s adorable! I’m against the government intervening, but some people really should not be allowed to have children.

  5. All babies have that nose for a while lol

  6. Laugh.out.loud likes this (the first one anyway)

  7. Btw “daddy” looks like skeletor.

  8. Poor kid is actually cute.

  9. ifitwerentformyhorse

    Angiie – what the fuck kind of name is Angiie anyway? – sounds like she kinda hates her baby. Not just the baby daddy, like the actual baby too.

  10. Yeah, calling any of your child’s features ugly isn’t exactly normal. “And give me my money”, I feel bad for that baby.
    and @ifitwerentformyhorse I’d say she put two ii’s in angie to make it harder to find her in a search, but I don’t think she cares too much about her reputation by the post. But Angie is a pretty awesome name actually.

  11. If someone involved in the last situation were smart, and I kind of doubt that, they would print that screen shot off and take it to court. That kid would be better off raised by wolves.

  12. People suck

  13. Unfortunately not enough Hawk. Case and point, please see exhibit number two.

  14. But Jacob has a neck tat AND a Livestrong bracelet. He’s like the Greek god of future daddy issues.

  15. She’s adorable! I’ll take her, where do I sign?

  16. “she beautiful nd ur gnna deny her?” “she got ur UGLY feet”

    Damn Angiie, a little harsh aren’t we? Octavia does not deserve your negativity. Plus, anyone who writes like that, on purpose, has no business having children.

    And furthermore, isn’t that money supposed to be for Octavia? God, I hope Jake has the common sense to save all texts, voicemails, tweets, posts Angiie ever sent him. That child should be taken away from you. I bet Jake would be a better parent.

  17. Wow they do have the same eyes, they’re both all pixelly, no denying fatherhood now.

  18. If Charles Darwin were about today to witness the advent of the internet and social networking, he might have second thoughts about his theory of evolution.

  19. I wonder, seeing as how she was named Octavia, does see only have 8 toes, like her dad?

  20. *she

  21. stomabeutel v1.1 with added empathic capabilities

    @19 she was named after the car she was conceived in :

    http://www.skoda-auto.com/COM/model/newoctavia/look/Pages/look.aspx?ff=0

  22. I like the first one because it says ‘Bell Comes Clean.’

    Maturity has not always been my strongest attribute to be honest.

  23. I had to sign in to comment. So I really really wanted to comment.
    In my state we have child protection service like thing, and they scour Facebook on both parties to ascertain character.
    AND, I just found this out, there’s this organization called SAT, don’t ask me what it stands for, I wasn’t really listening to the news story, but they have the legal whatever it is, to be able to force a person to be ‘de-sexed’ yes.. You heard me. No longer shall these spangers breed!

  24. I always say, stupid people shouldn’t breed.

  25. Dukey Smoothy Buns

    m0gumbo Sexual Abolishment Technologies?

  26. Sex annulment transaction?

  27. Well the first one was funny anyway.

  28. state administrative tribunal.. Not nearly as cool as sexual abolishment technologies. They can Also override a families wishes concerning blood transfusions, feeding tubes, Blah blah blah..

  29. Is that even legal!? The “de-sex-ment”?!? WTF!?

  30. Paraphrase: “She’s beautiful, how can you say she isn’t your child! Look how ugly she is!” WTF?

    And now, if you all will excuse me, I’m going back to figuring out a way to convince Obama that eugenics is a good idea.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.